tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8446351548038522890.post6387174017516894948..comments2024-03-28T16:15:19.319-04:00Comments on Saideman's Semi-Spew: I am a Potter-ite?!Steve Saidemanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/09881915512311951902noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8446351548038522890.post-1307332707804548982010-08-03T00:23:20.966-04:002010-08-03T00:23:20.966-04:00Having never read Harry Potter, I can only assume ...Having never read Harry Potter, I can only assume Rowling was original in some ways other than this philosophy. From Sartre's you are what you do to the Bible's "Ye shall know them by their fruits", many have covered this ground. Has Rowling's tasty chocolate prose disguised the fruity, religious center?Anonymousnoreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-8446351548038522890.post-63143483011572123332010-08-02T15:26:28.395-04:002010-08-02T15:26:28.395-04:00What a great quote. I'm frustrated anew in re...What a great quote. I'm frustrated anew in re-reading book 3 to David, in which Quidditch plays a major role, in what an utterly absurd sport it is. I truly think only a non-sports fan could have created this and I'm surprised Rowling's initial editors let it go. With a scoring system like this, you might as well have 5 people from each team sitting on the ground just watching the seekers. Or alternatively, the chasers would be much smarter to spend their time harassing the opponent's seeker.Steve Greenehttps://www.blogger.com/profile/04670226240905673727noreply@blogger.com