International Intervention Drinking Game

I was reading a piece yesterday where Qatar was basically given credit for "punching above its weight" and all I could think was: drink!  Yep, it is time for some help in developing the rules for the international intervention drinking game (with much of the inspiration inspired by NATO."

Simple rules: find a beverage you like (a good micro-brew is always a good choice); and drink when you hear/read references to:

• Metrics--as in: we need metrics for success.
• Two-tier NATO.  As in countries that do more and others that do less.
• Burden-sharing.  Oh my, we will get drunk quickly.
• Acronym rules:
• Anytime there is an acronym that takes more than five seconds to figure out.  Drink twice if the same acronym refers to two or more NATO concepts (SMR= senior military representative and six month review).
• Anytime there is an acronym that takes more than five seconds to figure out how to say aloud, as in PIFWC.
• The aforementioned "punch above its weight."
• When anybody expresses shock that countries and organizations might discriminate and be selective about where they intervene.
• Benchmark or Milestone (and only drunk people can really articulate the difference between the two).
• End-state.
• Way ahead.
• Consensus.
• Russia/China condemning external interference in the domestic affairs of countries (only small sips as this will happen often).

What am I forgetting?  Anything my readers might suggest to add? Yes, I am leaving R2P out because I don't want to be responsible for anyone's alcohol poisoning.

Updates:
Felix adds:

• Exit strategy.  This would lead to lots of controversy--the phrase would be uttered so often that any player would become catatonic, but we actually never see a real exit strategy, so one would have to chug if one of those ever came along.
• Boots on the ground.  And drink twice if media folks start debating what counts as boots.
• Oil.  Again, only sip unless the conflict is in some place where no one would ever expect oil (Afghanistan).

Grant, a fellow escapee from TTU and a Naval Reservist with one year on the ground in Baghdad adds:

• Whole of Government.  To which I would add: comprehensive approach, civ-mil integration.

Oh, and I forgot, if someone mentions Paddy Ashdown as a solution to the problems of coordination among the panoply of international and non-govt organizations, one beer must be chugged.