- Joe Biden is not VPing for another 4-8 years. HRC can get him to campaign since he is a party guy. Because his pal, Bo, will be doing the same thing.
- Andrew Cuomo? Aside from not needing New Yorkers (a recurring theme here), Cuomo would best be described as embattled.
- Michael Bloomberg? Really? Again, New York? A billionaire to fight a billionaire? No thanks.
- Kristen Gillibrand? A NY Senator? Isn't there already one of those on the ticket?
- Terry McAuliffe? This would be just to troll the diehard HRC haters, but speaking of embattled governors.
- Jeanne Shaheen? NH is just not that important of a state, despite its quadrennial effort to make itself relevant.
- Bill De Blasio? FFS, what is it with the NY fixation.
- Martin O'Malley? Um, he proved what during the campaign? That he is a lousy campaigner.
- Bernie Sanders? Didn't he prove he is a lousy team player?
- Janet Napolitano? Homeland Security is the most messed up part of the government bureaucracy, and University of California has, um, had some problems lately.
If I had to bet, I would bet on an Hispanic as this would just give Trump all kinds of fits and help ensure the Hispanics would turnout. I don't know enough about any of the ones listed in the article although I like Tom Perez from his appearance on Keeping It 1600. Julian Castro would be interesting as it would be fun to see the GOP have to dedicate resources to keep Texas, but Texas is not yet ready to swing, so that might be a stretch.
I know I will be wrong, but I will not be as wrong as half of this list.
Don't forget Tim Kaine!
ReplyDeleteAl Franken would've been perfect if he had some other professional work, aside than comedy, before he entered the political arena. I can only see Warren getting the VP nod if Clinton has unexpected trouble winning over Sanders supporters. Sherrod Brown has been mentioned frequently, but like many sitting Senators a Republican is his state's governor, so the Dems risk losing a seat. Both Tom Perez and Julian Castro's flaws are a lack of electoral experience, unfortunately.
ReplyDeleteThe #1 rule of balancing the ticket is "Do no harm." Given some of the attitudes about feminism still prevalent in the United States, she'll likely pick a man rather than two women. Then you have the age factor; HRC will be one of the oldest POTUSes at a hypothetical inauguration and she'd probably want a steady hand at the wheel if something goes wrong with her health. Keep watching Tim Kaine: basically Joe Biden with none of the baggage, as well as being a Spanish speaker.
Ah, Steve, Tim Kaine is definitely in play but also, um, easy to forget.
ReplyDeleteThe age thing is big--HRC is older so she needs someone younger even if they are not particularly hip with the kids (and, of course, trying to be hip is the best way not to be).
One unanticipated factor in the primaries was how age became a non-issue. HRC is 68, Trump is 69, and Sanders is *74*, which would have made him the oldest President if he went all the way. Given that average life expectancy keeps rising in the US, it's not a surprise this happened, but given the nature of the job it remains a BFD (see McCain 2008). It's how we perceive age: Warren is 66 but she doesn't look it.
ReplyDelete