I am not saying all vets or most vets or even some vets are radicalized by war and become crazy, racist criminals/terrorists. What I am curious about is:
- whether military experience is over-represented in the white supremacist movement(s),
- whether future supremacists join the military to gain skills that they intend to deploy as part of the movement,
- whether young white folks who have no experience of "others" become more radicalized once they interact with perhaps the most integrated workforce in the U.S.--the US armed forces,
- whether the military serves as a networking experience.
To be clear, in my one year at the Pentagon, I was amazed at how diverse the workforce there was, and it remains the most integrated of any workplace I have ever experienced. I do not think that the military or war causes many people to become white supremacists, but we do have examples of former military folks becoming terrorists--Timothy McVeigh comes to mind.
I am not a military sociologist so I do not know what has been done in this area, but I would imagine that some folks react to the military experience in ways that are not so positive. It may or may not have anything to do with combat. The twitter discussion today produced several testable hypotheses--can we assess whether white supremacists are more or less likely than the average American of the same race/class/background to have military experience? To have combat experience? I have no idea, but it is something that we should consider even as we ought not generalize and consider all veterans to be potential extremists.