I am reminded of this because I got a phone call as I was in the middle of moving Intern Spew home. Murray Brewster of The Canadian Press was seeking my views on the reduction in media engagement by the Canadian Forces in the midst of the Iraq/Syria bombing campaign.
My first reaction: was it even possible to reduce the level of media access from the current level of damned little access?
My second reaction was: crap, I have to find a parking spot across the street from my daughter's building.
My third reaction was: war does not stop for campaigns, so it is not clear why basic information about the war should stop. Yes, the Canadian Armed Forces are essentially government officials, and their declaring of success might be seen as their taking a side in the election (with the party that has cut them deeply and lied about it). But I didn't find this to be that problematic for a few reasons:
- There is not much of a risk of a real big declaration of success over the next 70 days or so. The bombing, which is already at a pretty low level (Canada is apparently involved in 2-3% of the sorties), is not going to produce a major change that can be pointed to as SUCCESS.
- The Canadian public is not that attentive to the campaign since there are no ramp ceremonies.
- The Canadian public is sufficiently mature to consider the situation--that the war is not going to end anytime soon, that their stances on it and on the parties' stances are probably not going to change much in two months, and that the government's strategy is meh.
Anyhow, the real lesson as always is that Canadian politics makes me feel like this guy: