I am looking forward to seeing a Political Scientist publishing a paper on the determinants of this vote--36 Senators voted for this amendment, 62 against.
Here is the list of Senators and their votes:
Grouped By Vote Position
YEAs ---36 | ||
Barrasso (R-WY) Baucus (D-MT) Bayh (D-IN) Bennett (R-UT) Brownback (R-KS) Bunning (R-KY) Chambliss (R-GA) Coburn (R-OK) Corker (R-TN) Crapo (R-ID) DeMint (R-SC) Ensign (R-NV) | Enzi (R-WY) Graham (R-SC) Grassley (R-IA) Hatch (R-UT) Hutchison (R-TX) Inhofe (R-OK) Isakson (R-GA) Kyl (R-AZ) LeMieux (R-FL) Lugar (R-IN) McCain (R-AZ) McCaskill (D-MO) | McConnell (R-KY) Murkowski (R-AK) Nelson (D-NE) Risch (R-ID) Roberts (R-KS) Sessions (R-AL) Shelby (R-AL) Thune (R-SD) Vitter (R-LA) Voinovich (R-OH) Webb (D-VA) Wicker (R-MS) |
NAYs ---62 | ||||
|
A few surprises: Webb of Virginia? Sure, he is a relatively conservative Democrat, but the NSF is in Arlington, and there are heaps of good universities in the state with strong political science departments. Guess I have to vote against him in the next primary. Despite frequent references to a possible national candidacy, Bayh of Indiana is now clearly a force for ignorance. Interesting that the Republican for Nebraska was against the amendment but the Democrat was for. Each playing to beyond their base?
[UPDATE]: That didn't take long--quick analysis of the vote.
1 comment:
Bayh is a shining example of America as an idiocracy instead of a meritocracy. The fact that that man is in the Senate says as much about our national lameness as does Coburn. He would never be there if his father had not been a famous Indiana politician.
Post a Comment