A friend of mine (h/t to JJ) posted on her facebook page the divergent reactions to the National Household Survey of Canada, which is like a census but is no longer mandatory (Harper hates social science along with all other sciences, apparently).
JJ noted that the anglophone press noted that immigrants are speaking more French than before. The French press notes that 20% of the immigrants do not speak French. Oh joy, the cup is either 80% full or 20% empty?
For me, what this means is this: I want Confirmation Bias to be a religion because I so strongly believe in it. Of course, those who want to see the "census" reporting French is under attack note that not all immigrants are picking up French, and, of course, those who think that the language thing is over-wrought in Quebec (which it is, I can confirm with bias). People see what they want to see much of the time. How can 80% of immigrants learning French be insufficient? Oy.
Anyhow, now that we are trying to start up Confirmation Bias as a religion, what does that require? Hmmmm. From here, I cropped this:
The idea is that information is filtered as it comes in, so that only that which confirms one's beliefs makes it through.
Ok, next step is dogma, which we borrow from the Ironborn of Game of Thrones: That Which We Believe is Never
The only rite of passage required to join is to believe what one has always believed no matter how much disconfirming information is provided.
Holidays? We can steal the holidays of pre-existing religions by focusing on those aspects of each holiday that celebrate the selective filtering of information.
I am not an expert on religion, so let me know what we need to add, and if it fits with latent existing beliefs, I will support your suggestions. If not, then not.