Senator Marilou McPhedran was
most impressive as she was able to bring feminist IR theory, such as Cynthia
Enloe, to the implementation of UN Resolution 1325 on Women, Peace, and
Security. I loved her conclusion--that outrage is good and necessary but
that it needs to be combined with strategic direction.
Jody Thomas was much more
interesting today, presenting her story than earlier in the week at the CDAI
conference, presenting the Minister's message. Tis only natural and
inevitable. I found her
discussion of Canada's role in fostering the
Jordanian Female Engagement Teams (units of female soldiers designed to engage
the other half of the population). Just as the Western countries learned
that they needed women to talk to women in the Muslim world, so do the
countries of the region. I also found Thomas's story--her father, the
commander of the Navy, discouraged her from joining the Navy because she should
only join an organization that she could ultimately lead--most
interesting. I noted on twitter that the Deputy Minister job is a wee bit
higher than the commander of the navy*--so she did alright. She referred
to the students in the room as being beacons of hope, but I am pretty sure that
they saw her as being pretty beacon-y. I also liked her line about
failure not being an end-state, but being a part of the growth process. The key
insightful line is that men tend to have sponsors, but women tend to have
mentors. This was very striking, and I need to think about it some, but
the general idea is that men getting help from senior folks is normal and
expected, whereas women getting assistance may be seen as unfair and
unmeritorious ways for women to get ahead.
The next panel featured four
senior female officers--a pilot, a doctor, a lawyer, and a general--along with
#BattleRhythm co-host, gamechanger, and inspiration for all of these young
women Stéfanie von Hlatky. The panel covered a lot of territory, as each
discussed their experiences. They were, indeed, a group of badass women,
and proved to be most inspiring to the audience (male and female). I got
to talk to a few of these officers before and afterward. Most impressive.
The last session was a talk
by Mercedes Stephenson (I am skipping chronological order since I have more to
say about my talk and panel). We plan to have present her at the CDSNSummer Institute in August, and I am feeling even better about that plan after
hearing her speak about her experiences. I hadn't realized that her degree
was in Strategic Studies (thanks Bercuson!) and not journalism. She was
at the Pentagon the same time I was, so it was very interesting to hear her
perspective of that time and place. She pushed through opposition to her
going on a trip to Afghanistan--that her presence would have disturbed the
chemistry of the guys. Oy. She still gets a ton of grief online for
being a woman daring to be smart on TV. She presented the usual
advice--stand your ground--and unusual advice--a door wedge is great for hotel
rooms when folks might give away keys to your room. She also had good
advice for how to detect fake news and Russian trolling. She noted that
the CAF responded quickly to her request for info, which allowed them both to
deflate an effort to pass a bit of fake news, whereas the RCMP, by resisting
calls to be transparent, gave space for Russian trolling to succeed.
view of the crowd from the stage |
I was on the next panel with
Yolande Bouka of Queens, Jeffrey Rice of the CDSN (and of Macewan starting July
1st), and Lindsay Coombs of DND. Lindsay helped to create WIISQ, has been
a rockstar in the various defence circles, and is now working on her
dissertation while working at DND. I was the oldest on the panel by far. My colleagues on the panel talked about their
work--Jeff on protection of civilians in Afghanistan by UN/NATO, Yolande on women in non-state armed groups, and Lindsay on the larger effort to develop norms
regarding child soldiers.
I was very much the outlier
as I don't do work on gender. So, I decided to talk about what I have seen
over the course of my career--much progress but not enough damn it (the latter
was inspired by many conversations with Kid Spew, Teen Spew, and, now, Adult
Abroad Spew).
I started by discussing being
an ally thanks, in part, to this tweet:
Great thread. Thank you Steve...as I said before thank you for always being an Ally. Men being allies is key to achieving gender equity. Not enough to ‘lean in’. Hugs!!!— Bessma Momani (@b_momani) March 7, 2020
I joked that as a scholar of alliances, I know only too well that allies can be quite reliable or quite unreliable. I then noted a bit of discomfort with the term since my intention was always to be a decent human being. I sometimes have fallen short of that, but that has been the goal. That it has made me to be viewed as a good ally says something quite sad actually. Although I will take the compliment in the spirit it was given.
Then I started my
presentation by showing a book ad and noted the diversity of men--those with
glasses, those without, those with hats/without, those with hair, etc. In 2020,
we still get ads like this. So, not much progress.
I then relayed what happened
earlier in the week: that the head of personnel, a three star admiral, was
grilled by two female cadets at the big Ottawa conference. The highlight
for me was when the admiral was wondering why men tended to suggest that women get
promoted to key roles because of their gender and not because of merit, and one
of the cadets suggested that it might be to due to the culture of the
organization.
Which was a nice seque to
discussing my career, going from a spot where there were few women taking hard
security classes to working at a place that is quite diverse. So, woot,
progress.
And then I discussed how
there are not enough women at the higher ranks, explaining the leaky pipeline
with much help from Sara Mitchell. I quickly mentioned my blog post where
I was challenged to list the senior women of color in IR in the US and Canada
and found about ten names. Which means few mentors/role models.
I then did suggest there was much progress in the security field by highlighting the books written by so many sharp women: Kelleher, Avant, Weitsman, Jenne, Toft, Talmadge, Greenhill, Goddard, Fortna, Kreps, Chenoweth, that von Hlatky that keeps showing up, the Brooks non-sisters, just to name a few.
But sexual harassment is
still a big problem with universities focused more on protecting themselves
than their students. I highlighted the need for collective action, which
is where student organizations can come in.
I concluded with a discussion
of what the CDSN is doing as one of our goals is to foster a more inclusive,
diverse next generation. I highlighted how many women are in our
leadership team (about half). I mentioned our diversity/inclusivity fireside chat with Shawn Skelly of Out in NationalSecurity and Bonnie Jenkins of Women of Color Advacning Peace and Security--WCAPS. That we have a WIIS-Canada for women, but no equivalents for other groups, which is why we brought organizers of such American organizations to Canada to hopefully inspire similar efforts here.
And then I promoted ourCapstone event which is on Tuesday in Toronto. The idea is to present the best of 2019's presentations from across Canada on defence and security and bring them to one spot to amplify our partners' efforts and the individuals. And funny, it was not hard to come up with a group of sharp people that is a wee bit more diverse than Cambria's ad.
And then I promoted ourCapstone event which is on Tuesday in Toronto. The idea is to present the best of 2019's presentations from across Canada on defence and security and bring them to one spot to amplify our partners' efforts and the individuals. And funny, it was not hard to come up with a group of sharp people that is a wee bit more diverse than Cambria's ad.
I really enjoyed meeting both
the women who spoke and those in the audience. While my talk was about
the progress, obstacles, and regression for women in the defence/security
space, I am very optimistic about the future. That these young women are
the future, just as I used to say that Stef vH was the future of Canadian
defence studies (she is now the present). So, yeah, the future is mighty bright.
* No, the Navy chief is
not under the Deputy Minister, but he is under the CDS who is parallel to the
DM.
No comments:
Post a Comment