During the last dinner of the ISA, I learned that I have a
law. Well, my old chair at TTU (the very
best chair I have ever had [that might seem like I am damning him with faint
praise, but that is not my intention]), David Lanoue said that he frequently
invokes Saideman’s law.
Well, what is Saideman’s Law? Apparently, during a department meeting at
TTU, one of my colleagues was arguing that we had to do something because we
had done it before. I responded by
saying that we should not do something that is quite stupid just because we did
this stupid thing before. The essence is
that precedents should only bind if the precedent has legitimacy. So, David, as chair at Alabama and now Dean
at Columbus State College, has frequently invoked my argument when somebody
says that “well, we did this before, so we need to do it again, even if it is a
bad idea.”
Update: one of my commenters phrased the law thusly:
Update: one of my commenters phrased the law thusly:
Saideman's Law: You are not bound (legally, morally, or otherwise) by the worst decision you ever made.
My take should not surprise readers of the Spew since I have
railed against tradition for the sake of tradition, but it was gratifying to
learn that my outburst has had a lasting impact. I just need to find a snappy line to go with
Saideman’s Law so I can make a bumper sticker akin to “Gravity: It is not just
a good idea; it’s the law!”
Any suggestions?
5 comments:
This is also known as an is-ought fallacy...
This is also known as an is-ought fallacy...
It's a great law, often invoked when someone cites precedent as a reason to make a dumb decision regarding tenure and promotion.
"Well, 10 years ago we promoted Margot to Full Professor based on her publishing three letters to the editor in the Springfield Banner. So now that Jim Bob has published his third letter, we have to give him tenure, too! Otherwise, we might get sued."
Saideman's Law: You are not bound (legally, morally, or otherwise) by the worst decision you ever made.
Outstanding stuff! I'm stealing this (with attribution, of course) and using it liberally. This comes up on an almost daily basis in administration, as you might imagine.
Option 1: Stupid is as stupid does.
Option 2: Past performance does dictate future performance.
Option 3: Stare Decicis only applies if I like the precedent in question (a/k/a the Thomas/Scalia rule).
Post a Comment